Categories
Mental Health

Why I Choose the Bear, pt. 1

Content warning: This post makes references to verbal assault and threats of sexual violence.

There is a trend going around on social media: “Women, if you were hiking in the woods alone, would you rather encounter a bear or a man?” Overwhelmingly, women are saying, “Bear.” Even pre-teen and teen girls are saying, “Bear.” (My own fourteen-year-old went for bear when I asked her.) Why a bear? It’s a wild animal that could maul you. This is true. A bear can and will attack if it feels threatened or if you’re in the way of its getting food. However, in the grand scheme of things, bears don’t want to put up with humans. (Same, furry friend. Same.) In fact, if you see a bear and make distinctly human noise, it’s going to run away. The odds of getting attacked by a bear is 1 in 2.1 million. There are only forty bear attacks in the entire world each year, and maybe one of those that occurs in the US is fatal.

By contrast, over half–50%, more than 1 in 2–of women have been sexually assaulted. One out of every six women has been the victim of rape or attempted rape. Is it any wonder that women are choosing to take their chances with the bear? Given the statistical likelihood that men will be victims of violence from other men, even they would be smart to opt for the bear. (And why do some men feel the need to carry a gun everywhere they go, even church? In case they have to protect themselves from… Not a bear.)

As the discussion continues, there’s a catch-phrase that keeps emerging: “A bear would never.” At the same time, there’s a list developing. A bear would never:

  • Rape someone.
  • Attack someone just because they’re vulnerable.
  • Take video of the attack to post to social media.
  • Get other bears in on the attack.
  • Brag about attacking someone.

Let me tell you something else a bear wouldn’t do. A bear would never threaten to cut off a young girl’s breasts to have them for himself.

I was in seventh grade, in junior high school. I rode the school bus to and from school each day. Living in the corner of the county farthest from the school, ours was about the third or fourth stop on the route which means a lot of time on the bus in the mornings and afternoons. Our bus driver assigned us seats. I was assigned to sit with a guy a named Mike who was two years older and considerably bigger than me. And he was an ugly mudda. As the late great Lewis Grizzard would put it, Mike could scare a dog off a meat wagon. And his inside was even less attractive.

I “blossomed” early. That means my genetic makeup ensured that I’d be needing a bra in fourth grade. I hated it! I was the first girl in my class to have breasts. By the time I started junior high school, of course I was no longer the only girl with breasts, but mine had gotten a head start on growing. I was self-conscious of them. We existed together. I neither flaunted nor hid them.

Mike was a breast guy. As we sat on the bus for those long rides to and from school, he made no secret of the fact he ogled my boobs. He didn’t go so far as to touch them, thank God. But what he said was just as bad. You see, he wanted to touch them. He let me know in no uncertain terms that he wanted to cut them off and hang them on his bedroom wall so he could play with them whenever he wanted. He wanted to mutilate me for his own pleasure. And he pretty much always carried a butterfly knife on him that he’d play with on the bus, hidden by the seat back in front of us, safe from the watchful eyes of the driver way at the front. (We were about four rows from the back of the bus.)

This is the first time I’m telling this story. I never told my parents what Mike said. I was scared to. I can, to this day, imagine my mom saying, “Just ignore him and he’ll stop.” I did ignore him, but he didn’t stop. I can imagine my dad finding out where Mike lived and going over and having a talk with him and his parents. They might would have even gone to the principal. But my parents would have still made me ride the bus. (It was the most pragmatic solution given the relative geography of the school versus both their jobs.) They couldn’t have protected me at school. Mike would still carry his knife every day. I didn’t talk because I was scared of the possible repercussions and probably retaliation.

My story is just one of a handful of stories I have personally, and one of but millions held by women all over the world. The endless degradation. Being reduced to our body parts–parts that aren’t sexual but have been sexualized by men through the centuries. Parts whose purposes are to give and sustain life in infants. Treated as objects rather than people.

Then there’s the fear. For me, it was, Is today the day I’ll get cut? The fear of pain. The fear of being killed in retaliation for speaking out. In this instance, I didn’t have the fear of not being believed. Note I said, “in this instance.” There would come other times when that fear governed my inaction.

So why would I choose the bear? Even if the bear were to kill me, it’d only be once. No one would blame me for enticing the bear to attack me, for looking tasty merely by existing.

And that’s what women deal with. We as a historical collective have been told through fucking centuries that we are to blame for men’s actions, that we’re tempting like Eve or we’re Jezebels who lead men astray away from their “godly holiness” when all we are doing is existing. So in this hypothetical situation, were the bear to attack the woman, no one would wonder what she’d been wearing. No one would blame her for the attack. People would be like, “Bears attack. It’s what they do.” Funny how people basically use the same excuse for men, that whole “boys will be boys” bullshit, then turn around and blame the woman, anyway.

Categories
Uncategorized

Faces of War

With the Russian invasion of Ukraine comes the faces of war. You’ve seen them, I’m sure. They are women. They are children. They are fathers devastated by the loss of their families. They are even Russian soldiers who are too human to want to follow a homicidal maniac’s orders to kill innocents.

War always brings its innocents. Eighteen-year-old boys who are ripped from home by conscription and handed a gun after six weeks of training are sent to kill other eighteen-year-old boys who are pretty much just like them, separated only by language, culture, and nationality. We’ve seen the slaughter of women, children, and the elderly. We have seen remote attacks on hospitals and apartment communities. Russians have fired upon caravans of Ukrainians heading out of the country in search of refuge in neighboring countries. Remarkable is that I’ve yet to hear the term “collateral damage.” These innocents aren’t unfortunate victims of repercussions after a missile attack. They themselves are the targets.

This war is showing the strength of women. Yes, we’ve seen the heartbreaking images of suitcases, the only remains of a man’s family. We’ve seen the pictures of a pregnant woman, a survivor, however briefly, of a missile attack on a maternity hospital. (Her baby and she died the following day.)

Then there’s Olena Kurilo, a 52-year-old kindergarten teacher. Early in the war, the apartment complex where she lived with her husband was struck by a missile. She was inside their apartment, and the windows were all blown out, glass shrapnel flying everywhere. She survived with a damaged eye but otherwise superficial wounds. Her husband was saved by a fortuitous flat tire. They now live outside of the city; their adult daughter is still living in a shelter.

Olena Kurilo after the missile blast that destroyed her home.

Olena is half Russian on her mother’s side and is a proud Ukrainian citizen. She boldly speaks out against the atrocities happening in her country. She envisions peace, a reunion of her family, and has hope to teach and love grandchildren one day.

Another woman who became “internet famous” in the early days of the war is anonymous to us. This article contains both the video and the transcript from her encounter with a patrol of Russian soldiers. She was furious with them, with their occupation of her country, and she didn’t hold back. She cursed at them and straight-up cursed them (“And from this moment, you are cursed.”). She offered handfuls of sunflower seeds to these Russian soldiers and asked them to put them in their pockets so that when they die, sunflowers will grow.

This was the first indication to me that there is a vast difference in ideology between the boots-on-the-ground Russian soldiers and that coming out of the Kremlin. While this woman was on her brave vitriolic tirade against these occupying forces, the man tried over and over to get her to move on, even using “please.” He told her to move on in several attempts to de-escalate the situation. What he didn’t do was more remarkable to me. He didn’t draw out his side arm and shoot her where she stood.

While media shows Russian police dragging away peaceful protesters to prison–even holding a blank piece of poster board can get you the maximum of fifteen years in prison–this woman who was “protesting” with the voice of her fear and anger walked away from this encounter on her own occupied home soil (probably with pockets still full of sunflower seeds). The soldier didn’t want to kill her and chose not to. I hope she lives to see the end of this war.

Amidst the Russian trolls parroting Putin’s lies and news of Putin’s saber rattling, these glimpses of humanity and strength give me hope. More hope comes as I see all the ways that the Ukrainians are “waging peace” by giving food and hot tea to their Russian prisoners of war. They’re “waging peace” by letting the POWs call home and allowing their mothers to come get them. Though likely inundated by Putin’s incessant anti-Ukraine propaganda, these soldiers are experiencing the compassion and peace-waging of every day Ukrainian citizens.

What’s most remarkable to me is, there is no international law or code of war that makes the Ukrainians behave this way. Without a formal declaration of war, the rules of the Geneva Convention don’t apply. We saw the same thing in Vietnam. Since that was a “police action” and a “conflict,” the Vietnamese were under no obligation to treat our soldiers with kindness or compassion, and, in fact, our POWs were tortured and held in abysmally inhumane conditions (especially in the south). The Ukrainians are choosing better. They are choosing compassion. They are acting according to the Way of Jesus, as much as it’s possible during times of war and occupation.

 

 

 

Enjoy this blog? Please spread the word.

RSS
Follow by Email
LinkedIn
Share
INSTAGRAM